Michael E. Smith

Of Counsel | Sacramento, Fresno, San Luis Obispo

Tel: 916.329.7433
Fax: 916.329.9050
Vcard   | Bio


Michael E. Smith is Of Counsel and one of the founders of Lozano Smith. He is a school law attorney, an educator and a speaker. Mr. Smith graduated from Claremont Men's College (Magna Cum Laude) and obtained his J.D. from the University of California at Davis. He was admitted to the California Bar in 1980, and has represented school districts for over 40 years. In addition to his General Counsel experience in all aspects of Educational law, Mr. Smith offers specific expertise in collective bargaining, labor and personnel, student discipline matters, and constitutional questions. Mr. Smith also works extensively drafting superintendent and administrator contracts with a specialized focus on management compensation and CalSTRS/CalPERS Retirement issues.

Professional Affiliations

Mr. Smith is a past president of the California Council of School Attorney and the current president of the California School Boards Association Education Legal Alliance Advisory Board. Mr. Smith served for eight (8) years as a member of the National Council of School Attorneys (COSA), which is affiliated with the National School Boards Association's. Mr. Smith also serves on the COSA Amicus Committee. Mr. Smith is also a member of the Board of Directors of the Civic Engagement Center, a non-profit organization that focus on civic engagement in schools.

Presenter Experience

Mr. Smith's talents are highly sought as a presenter on education law issues. He is a frequent speaker at national and statewide conferences, which include the National School Boards Association, the National Council of School Attorneys, the California School Boards Association, the California Council of School Attorneys, and the Association of California School Administrators.


Mr. Smith has written numerous articles. They include:
  • "The Effective Use of Counsel" published by LRP's The Special Educator, September 2002;
  • "The Collective Bargaining Impacts of No Child Left Behind" published in LRP Managing School Business, August 2003 and the NCLB Advisor, August 2003;
  • "Educators: Set Aside 'Culture of Cynicism', Mind-set of Negativity; Focus on Positive" published by LRP's California Special Education Alert, January 2004;
  • "Find Silver Lining in Legal Gloom, Doom" (re: NCLB, IDEA & other acronyms) and "NCLB Far From Perfect, But Signals a Push in the Right Direction", both published in LRP Publications, January 2004;
  • "Lawfully Teaching About Religion in Schools" published by the NSBA, April 2005;
  • "Keep Staff Out Of The Dark On Parental Notification Mandates" published by LRP Publications in Your NCLB Advisor, March 2006;
  • "The Intersection of Sexual Orientation, Free Speech, and Religion in the Schools" published by The Council of School Attorneys, November 2006;
  • "The Girl Who Would Be Prom King" published by NSBA, June 2007;
  • "Certificated Step and Column Freezes" published by School Services of California in the Fiscal Report, Volume 30, No. 1, January 15, 2010;
  • "Code of Conduct: Reviewing and Auditing Your Hiring and Supervision Practices for Athletic Coaches" published by American School Board Journal, Volume 198, No. 8, August 2011; and
  • "Changes will affect how juvenile courts interact with schools" published by ACSA in EdCal, June 29, 2020.

Significant Cases
Morse v. Frederick (2007) 551 U.S. 393. Mr. Smith served as Amicus Counsel for the National School Boards Association and the American Association of School Administrators. The Supreme Court of the United States upheld the right of a high school principal in Juneau, Alaska, to discipline a student who held up a banner proclaiming "BONG HiTS 4 JESUS" during a school endorsed activity even without a showing of likely material disruption to the school environment. In doing so, the court overruled the previous decision of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, which would have imposed personal liability on the principal for violation of the student's First Amendment rights.

Atwater Elementary School District v. Department of General Services (2007) 41 Cal.4th 227. The California Supreme Court issued a landmark decision when it held that the four-year period for a school district to bring dismissal charges against a teacher is not absolute. The District contended the four-year period should be extended based on principles of equity and fairness in order to permit the District to introduce evidence of sexual misconduct that occurred more than four years before the filing of the dismissal notice.

Eklund v. Byron Union School District (9th Cir. 2005) 154 Fed. Appx. 648. Mr. Smith served as Amicus Counsel on behalf of the California School Boards Association. The District won before the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, having demonstrated that the school district lawfully taught about religion.

Duval v. Board of Trustees (2001) 93 Cal.App.4th 902. Established the principle that a legislative body may conduct comprehensive personnel evaluations in closed session, including a discussion of evaluation criteria and setting goals for future performance.

CTA v. Rialto Unified SD (1997) 14 Cal.4th 627.Mr. Smith Served as Amicus Counsel. In this case the California Supreme Court clarified the priority to be given to presently employed qualified, credentialed employees for coaching positions.

Belanger v. Madera Unified School Dist. (9th Cir. 1992) 963 F.2d 248. The Belanger case established that K-12 school districts have 11th Amendment immunity to Section 1983 civil rights claims.

Dilts v. Cantua Elementary School Dist. (1987) 189 Cal.App.3d 27. This case established that the doctrine of "substantial compliance" cannot be used to overcome a plaintiff's failure to comply with the Government Claims Act.

Episode 47 The Supreme Court Speaks: Guidelines for Regulation of Student Off-Campus Speech

By: Michael SmithSloan Simmons-

For the first time since 2007, the United States Supreme Court has weighed-in on student free speech rights under the First Amendment. In Mahanoy Area School District v. B.L., the high court addressed for the first time the parameters and limits for schools' regulation of student off-campus speech. In this episode, our attorneys break down the Supreme Court's decision and its implications for California school districts with Lozano Smith student speech experts Mike Smith and Sloan Simmons.

On Location at CSBA's AEC - Insights on Critical Issues Impacting Education Agencies by Statewide Education Law Experts (A Bonus Episode of the Lozano Smith Podcast)

By: Sloan SimmonsMichael Smith-

While on location at the California School Boards Association's (CSBA) 2019 Annual Education Conference, host Sloan Simmons talks with CSBA General Counsel, Kathryn Meola, and one of Lozano Smith's founding partners, Mike Smith, about critical legal issues impacting educational and other public agencies heading in 2020 and beyond.

Religion in the Schools - A Vehicle for Inclusivity

By: Michael SmithJoshua Whiteside-

In advance of his upcoming free seminar at California State University Fresno, attorney Michael Smith, joined by associate Josh Whiteside, talks with host Devon Lincoln about the role that religion plays in the lives of public school students and their teachers and other staff, and how schools can create a climate of inclusivity and support for students of every background and faith tradition. For more details on the upcoming seminar, see the show notes below.